(NewsNation Now) — Apple recently unveiled plans to scan U.S. iPhones for images of child sexual abuse, drawing applause from child protection groups but raising concern among some security researchers that the system could be misused, including by governments looking to surveil their citizens.
The tool designed to detect known images of child sexual abuse, called “neuralMatch,” will scan images before they are uploaded to iCloud. If it finds a match, the image will be reviewed by a human. If child pornography is confirmed, the user’s account will be disabled and the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children will be notified.
The system will not flag images not already in the center’s child pornography database. Parents snapping innocent photos of a child in the bath presumably need not worry. But researchers say the matching tool — which doesn’t “see” such images, just mathematical “fingerprints” that represent them — could be put to more nefarious purposes.
Privacy expert Sharon Bradford Franklin says that what Apple is attempting is admirable, but believes it poses privacy a risk.
“You should not feel fully comforted because these policy choices can easily give way in the face of demands that Apple expands and repurpose its new tools,” she said.
Bradford believes the context of what images Apple is scanning could easily change over time.
“Right now, Apple is limiting the photo scanning to scanning for hash images of child sexual abuse material,” she said. “But absolutely, the next thing to come down is going to be a government request to scan for terrorist content.”
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
- ☀ September 26: An Amtrak train derails. And Hurricane Sam is upgraded to Category 3, and it’s getting stronger.
- Tony Awards and TV special hope to be the jab Broadway needs
- Petito case renews call to spotlight missing people of color
- ‘Mr. Baseball’ in the front row at last: Brewers honor announcer Bob Uecker for 50 years behind mic
- With poll numbers down, Supreme Court justices insist they’re not ‘political hacks’